15 Jan 2012, Posted by yohami in thoughts, 12 Comments.

Bias, testosterone and facial screening


http://www.hookingupsmart.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/face-research.jpg

Inspired by HUS

Look at these two faces and answer the following questions:

Who of these dudes has 10 kids more than the other?
Who has read 10 times more books?
Who has more street´s smarts?
Who is more in contact with his emotions?
Who would you trust to carry a gun?
Who do you think is better with finances?
Who is better with large groups of people?
Who would make a better chef?
Who would make a better business owner?
Who of these two dudes is a painter?
Who is a celebrity?
Who is more submissive?
Who has a better sense of duty?
Who is better at magic?
Who eats more?
Who cries more?
Who is more stable?
Who is more empathetic?
Who is healthier?
Who has more to prove?
Who is an established architect?
Who is better with his hands?
Who has a bigger cock?

Assuming your gut works like mine you´ve been zigzagging from left to right and back. I think this stuff is biological, a screening-bias that is mostly right every time.

Each of these dudes can be *attractive* but they play on different ladders and at different strengths. The dude on the left has a high testosterone, manly face. The dude at the right has the opposite. Each face carries with a set of N traits. They will be attractive to people screening for such traits, like characters in a casting for a movie.

The dude at the left is more manly and will prevail when nature is though, when there´s competition and strong hierarchies. The dude at the right is less manly, and will survive when mental gymnastics are required.

When things are rough natural selection is more important. Having a lot of offspring is important. Sex is more important. Gender and differentiation are more important. You can picture the dude on the left fucking, fighting, breeding, owning.

When there are tons of resources and the species are safe, natural selecion ceases to work, sex is less important, having offspring is less important. Conservation of resources / inertia is whats important. You can picture the guy on the right daydreaming, playing some supportive role.

Another thing involved here is horizontality and verticality.

We associate all things vertical with “higher order” things, spirituality, intellect etc. Long faces look wiser. Think of every elf-looking character ever.

Then we associate all things horizontal with “earth-mundane” things, body, eating, fucking, fighting, etc. Wide faces look more earthgrounded. Look at every troll-dwarf character ever.

The guy on the left could play either the criminal gang boss or the tough cop who chases him.

The guy on the right could play the detail-obsessed serial killer, or the shy reporter investigating the story.

And that ends our facial-traits recognition session for today.

Promote Post

Enjoyed this post?


12 Comments

January 15, 2012 10:13 am

Olive

“The dude at the right is more manly and will prevail when nature is tough, when there´s competition and strong hierarchies. The dude at the right is less manly, and will survive when mental gymnastics are required.”

Wow, you did it too, Yohami. There were like 4 or 5 girls who couldn’t type “left” or “right” in that HUS thread, me included. I find this hilarious… at first I thought it was a hindbrain thing, but if a GUY is doing it too, who knows. Typos abound.

January 15 2012 10:18 am

yohami

LOL. You´re right. Or is it left?

I dont know. I think its because its the same dude photoshoped, I had to look often because I wanted to say "right" every time. Besides I suspect left and right positioning also induces some bias, as in "the right hand is strong and the left hand is weak".

But I fixed it. Thanks.

January 15 2012 19:41 pm

Olive

Haha no prob. By the way, this is a good post, a good companion to Susan's. I went back to actually read it for meaning today, I had too many martinis last night. :-P It's amazing I could still proofread.

January 15, 2012 4:28 pm

Susan Walsh

I like this post, Yohami, I think you nailed it. Thanks for the link.

January 15 2012 19:27 pm

yohami

You´re welcome

January 16, 2012 8:36 am

(r)Evoluzione

This photographic extrapolation of testosteronic genotype/phenotype leaves much to be desired.

For one, the supposed low T guy has a huge forehead, which has been shown in several studies to correlate to high T, particulary high DHT, which is the ‘hot’ high libido, very metabolically active form of T.

This post serves primarily as a Testosterone-related facial Rorschach test, making visible (and risible) the OP’s and commenter’s biases. The initial confusion & difficulty with managing left versus right seems to bear out the wickedly subjective nature of this interpretation.

January 18, 2012 11:28 am

Bellita

Fantastic point, Yohami! I like the way you compare choosing between the two models to casting actors in a movie. It really depends on what the script calls for.

I think it was Badger who said that a woman’s attraction triggers change depending on where she is in life (which is her “script”) because a high status man in one age-related sphere (e.g., college) is different from a high status man in another age-related sphere (e.g., the professional world). She might honestly find each model more attractive than his rival at two different times in her life, and it’s not necessarily “settling.” Whether it is right for her to change scripts midstream is another issue. I believe Susan’s mission is to get modern women to write and to commit to the more long-term, family-oriented script earlier than they normally would.

January 18, 2012 7:39 pm

caRIOca

The guy on the left serves to “commit some mistakes” and “enjoy life”. The guy on the right is good for “something serious” and “life companion” (it means: good to raise the kids of the guy on the left).

January 18, 2012 8:41 pm

Nestorius

Dude on the right is more likely to survive than dude on left because dude on left will risk more dangers in life as testosterone will drive him more to risks especially if he is not very lucky in life.

January 19, 2012 11:33 pm

Nestorius

And one thing. This whole attraction thing based on facial features does not make sense. Shaving is very recent in human history. Throughout history, men had beards.
So how are females supposed to have developed skills to recognize the good genes through a shaved face, if for thousands of years, all men had beards??!!

April 25, 2012 7:50 pm

jackson jo

the author is idiot or what? the left man is grown-up version of right man, in other words, the left man is older in age, while the right man is still young.

April 25 2012 20:00 pm

yohami

I think it's photoshop

Posting your comment...

Leave A Comment


Subscribe to this comment via Email

http://yohami.com/blog/wp-content/themes/press